Foreskin restoration is the process of expanding the residual skin on the penis, via surgical or non-surgical methods, to create the appearance of a natural foreskin (prepuce) covering the glans penis. Foreskin restoration techniques are most commonly undertaken by men who have been circumcised or who have sustained an injury, but are also used by uncircumcised men who desire a longer foreskin and by men who have phimosis.

Reasons for foreskin restoration

Men attempt foreskin restoration for many reasons. These may range from simply wanting their foreskin back, to restoring a natural appearance, desire for improved sensitivity of the glans or better sexual stimulation, and regaining a sense of wholeness.[1] Some men cite a desire to regain a sense of control over their sexual organs and regaining lost self-esteem. Foreskin restoration may also be seen as a reverse form of body modification.


In classical Greek times the exposure of the glans of the penis was considered offensive and men with short foreskin would wear the Kynodesme to prevent its accidental exposure.

A form of foreskin restoration, historically known as epispasm, was practiced among some Jews in Hellenistic and Roman societies.[2]

European Jews, along with men circumcised for medical reasons, sought out underground foreskin restoration operations during World War II as a method to escape Nazi persecution.[3]

The practice was revived in the late twentieth century using modern materials and techniques. In 1982 a group called Brothers United for Future Foreskins (BUFF) was formed, which publicized the use of tape in non-surgical restoration methods. Later in 1991, another group called UNCircumcising Information and Resources Centers (UNCIRC) was formed.[4]

The National Organization of Restoring Men (NORM) was founded in 1989 in San Francisco, as a non-profit support group for men restoring their foreskins. It was originally known as RECAP, an acronym for the phrase Recover A Penis. In 1994 UNCIRC was incorporated into this group.[5] Since its founding, several NORM chapters have been founded throughout the United States, as well as internationally in Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia, New Zealand, and Germany.(See NORM Locations worldwide)

Surgical techniques

Surgical methods of foreskin restoration, sometimes known as foreskin reconstruction, usually involve a method of grafting skin onto the distal portion of the penile shaft. The grafted skin is typically taken from the scrotum, which contains the same smooth muscle (known as dartos fascia) as does the skin of the penis. One method involves a four stage procedure in which the penile shaft is buried in the scrotum for a period of time.[6] Such techniques are costly, and have the potential to produce unsatisfactory results or serious complications related to the skin graft.

British Columbia resident Paul Tinari, who was forcibly circumcised at the age of nine, has spoken with news media about his experience. Following a lawsuit Tinari's surgical foreskin restoration was covered by the British Columbia Ministry of Health. The plastic surgeon who performed the restoration was the first in Canada to have done such an operation, and used a technique similar to that described above.[7][8]

Nonsurgical techniques

Nonsurgical foreskin restoration, accomplished through tissue expansion, is the more commonly used method of foreskin restoration. Both the skin of the penile shaft and the mucosal inner lining of the foreskin, if any remains after circumcision, may be expanded.

The skin is pulled forward over the glans, and tension is applied manually, by using weights, or by using elastic straps. In the second two cases a device must be attached to the skin; surgical tape is often used. An example of a device using elastic straps is the T-Tape method, which was developed in the 1990s with the idea of enabling restoration to take place more rapidly. Many specialized foreskin restoration devices that grip the skin with or without tape are also commercially available. Tension from these devices may be applied by weights or elastic straps, by pushing the skin forward on the penis, or by a combination of these methods.

The amount of tension produced by any method must be adjusted to avoid causing injury, pain or discomfort, and may be seen as a limiting factor in foreskin restoration. There is a risk of damaging tissues from the use of excessive tension or applying tension for too long. Websites about foreskin restoration vary in their recommendations, from suggesting a regimen of moderate amounts of tension applied for several hours a day,[9] to recommending periods of higher tension applied for only a few minutes per day.[10][11]

Tissue stretching has long been known to stimulate mitosis, and research shows that regenerated human tissues have the attributes of the original tissue.[12] Unlike conventional skin expansion techniques, however, the process of nonsurgical foreskin restoration may take several years to complete, and depends on the amount of skin available to expand, the amount of skin desired in the end, and the regimen of stretching methods used. Patience and dedication are needed; support groups exist to help with these (see External links section). The act of stretching the skin is often described informally as "tugging" in these groups, especially those on the internet.

UPDATE 2016: Newer methods, RTM/Reverse Taping Method, DTR, CATII and other Inflation methods have been able to rebuild frenulums, GROW a complete "hood", in under 2 years. You see a method using SURGICAL TAPE,..., RUN FOREST RUN! LOL!!!!  The Standard tape since 2012 or so has been Nexcare or 3M's Waterproof Tape,..., PERIOD.  This information was good in 2006-7-8, but after 2009 all the  rules were broken with RTM, DTR, Inflation. T-Taping went out with the Neanderthals. If you feel the pain of not getting to choose, see your penis as mutilated, wish to regain as much sensitivity to your sexual experience,...,  you will want to restore. I have fooled many Urologists and my regular Urologist considers me intact since I even have "shed",..., smegma,  AND even better, ED can be caused from the exposure and lack of sensitivity thru the years, Restoration stopped my ED in a very early stage. It solved many of my own issues about my body as well,..., take it back guys -you can.

​UPDATE #2/2016: I guess it should be known that RTM, and DTR/CAT to a point , aII taget the inner skin, that is what remains of the 4skin after the circumcism. The DTR can be applied onto the penis to hit the inner skin as well to a point. If a plastic sur'geon can create  a large area of skin for a graph on a person's forehead using a saline bladder and enlarging it a little very day and after about 2-3 mounths have plenty to use for burns etc,..., Th newer 4skin restoration methods and legitamate gadgets, DTR, CAT II, RTM WILL deliver in a year, I did it in 12 months from a C0 'to a C8 and it has stayed for 5 years now, I am DTRing and tugging with a socket now for more over hang. The more skin you grow,..., the more you have to tension so the more and faster restoration happens. But MODERATE tension and good skin, (EMU OIL), 'care is the key to not have injuries. Injuries make scares and scare tissue takes 'up skin surface, it does not make it!

Artificial foreskins

Viafin-Atlas sells "the world's first prosthetic foreskin". It is a latex undergarment that protects the penis head in a moist environment. Another product is Manhood. It is an undergarment that holds the skin in place with people who have loose circumcisions.[citation needed]


Results of surgical foreskin restoration are much faster, but are often described as unsatisfactory, and most restoration groups advise against them.

Results of non-surgical methods vary widely, and depend on such factors as the amount of skin present at the start of the restoration, degree of commitment, technique, and the individual's body. Foreskin restoration only creates the appearance of a natural foreskin; certain parts of the natural foreskin cannot be reformed. In particular, the frenar band, a tissue structure extending around the penis at the frenulum[13][14] which helps to contract the tip of the foreskin so that it remains positioned over the glans, cannot be recreated. Restored foreskins can appear much looser at the tip and some men report difficulty in keeping the glans covered. Surgical "touch-up" procedures exist to reduce the orifice of the restored foreskin, recreating the tightening function of the frenar band, though they have not proven successful in every case.[15] A loose effect can also be alleviated by creating increased length, but requires a longer commitment to the restoration program. In addition, several websites claim that the use of O-rings during the restoration program can train the skin to maintain a puckered shape.

Physical aspects

The natural foreskin has three principal components, in addition to blood vessels, nerves and connective tissue: skin, which is exposed exteriorly; mucous membrane, which is the surface in contact with the glans penis when the penis is flaccid; and a band of muscle within the tip of the foreskin. Generally, the skin grows more readily in response to stretching than does the mucous membrane. The ring of muscle which normally holds the foreskin closed is often completely removed in the majority of circumcisions and cannot be regrown, so the covering achieved via stretching techniques is usually looser than that of a natural foreskin. According to some observers, however, it is difficult to distinguish a restored foreskin from a natural foreskin because restoration produces a "nearly normal-appearing prepuce."[16]

Nonsurgical foreskin restoration does not restore portions of the frenulum or the ridged band removed during circumcision. Although not commonly performed, there are surgical "touch-up" techniques that can re-create some of the functionality of the frenulum and dartos muscle.

The process of foreskin restoration seeks to regenerate some of the tissue removed by circumcision, as well as providing coverage of the glans. According to research, the foreskin comprises over half of the skin and mucosa of the human penis [1].

In some men, foreskin restoration may alleviate certain problems they attribute to their circumcisions. Such problems, as reported to an anti-circumcision group by men circumcised in infancy or childhood, include prominent scarring (33%), insufficient penile skin for comfortable erection (27%), erectile curvature from uneven skin loss (16%), and pain and bleeding upon erection/manipulation (17%). The poll also asked about awareness of or involvement in foreskin restoration, and included an open comment section. Many respondents and their wives "reported that restoration resolved the unnatural dryness of the circumcised penis, which caused abrasion, pain or bleeding during intercourse, and that restoration offered unique pleasures, which enhanced sexual intimacy."[17]

Foreskin restoration can be a means for man (and his sexual partner) to experience the rolling and gliding action of the penile shaft skin along the erect shaft. This mode of stimulation is not available to circumcised men without restoration.

Some men who have undertaken foreskin restoration report a visibly smoother glans, which they attribute to decreased levels of keratinization following restoration. However, a study that investigated the effect of glans coverage on levels of keratinisation found no difference in keratin levels [2] within the group studied.

Although research studies have found no measurable difference with respect to glans sensitivity [3] [4], some men have reported a qualitative improvement in sensitivity of the glans. Some have suggested that the perceived sensitivity gains of the glans are psychological, with glans sensitivity itself being unaffected [5][6]. According to some, however, protecting the glans from dryness and abrasion with clothing can allow the glans texture to change to a quality similar to that of intact genitalia among men who undergo this process.

Emotional, psychological, and psychiatric aspects

Foreskin restoration has been reported as having beneficial emotional results in some men, and has been proposed as a treatment for negative feelings in some adult men about their infant circumcisions.[6][16][18][19] Such claims are not supported by all medical authorities, however.

Such negative feelings were discussed in the poll mentioned above. Respondents suffered from: emotional distress, manifesting as intrusive thoughts about one's circumcision, including feelings of mutilation (60%), low self-esteem/inferiority to intact men (50%), genital dysmorphia (55%), rage (52%), resentment/depression (59%), violation (46%), or parental betrayal (30%). Many respondents (41%) reported that their physical/emotional suffering impeded emotional intimacy with partner(s), resulting in sexual dysfunction. Almost a third of respondents (29%) reported dependence on substances or behaviors to relieve their suffering (tobacco, alcohol, drugs, food and/or sexual compulsivity).

In "Prepuce Restoration Seekers: Psychiatric Aspects," a 1981 report published in the Archives of Sexual Behavior, four men seeking surgical foreskin restoration were examined. The report provides descriptions of the motivational forces behind the desire for foreskin restoration among these four men.[20]


Kirby states that restoration procedures are "certainly feasible, but they are not without considerable risks, not least of which is loss of sensation of the penile shaft", and comments that "the placebo effect [...] cannot be discounted."[21]

See also


  1. Bigelow, Jim (1992). The Joy of Uncircumcising!: Exploring Circumcision: History, Myths, Psychology, Restoration, Sexual Pleasure, and Human Rights. Aptos, CA: Hourglass Book Publishing, 113–114. ISBN 0-9630482-1-X. 
  2. Rubin, Jody P. (1980-07). "Celsus's Decircumcision Operation". Urology 16 (1): 121–4. 
  3. Tushmet, Leonard (1965). "Uncircumcision". Medical Times 93 (6): 588–93. 
  4. Bigelow, Jim (1994). "Uncircumcising: undoing the effects of an ancient practice in a modern world". Mothering Summer: 121–4. 
  5. Griffiths, R. Wayne. NORM - History. Retrieved on 2006-08-21.
  6. 6.0 6.1 Greer, Donald M.; Mohl, Paul C.; Sheley, Kathy A. (1982). "A technique for foreskin reconstruction and some preliminary results". The Journal of Sex Research 18 (4): 324–30. 
  7. Euringer, Amanda (2006-07-25). "BC Health Pays to Restore Man's Foreskin". The Tyee. 
  8. Laliberté, Jennifer (2006-06-30). "BC man's foreskin op a success". National Review of Medicine 3 (12). 
  9. Griffiths, R. Wayne. NORM - Recommended Restoration Regimen. Retrieved on 2006-08-27.
  10. Foreskin Restoration Chat Manual Restoration Method and Guide. Retrieved on 2006-08-27.
  11. Manual Methods of Foreskin Restoration. Retrieved on 2007-07-19.
  12. Cordes, Stephanie; Calhoun, Karen H.; Quinn, Francis B. (1997-10-15). "Tissue Expanders". University of Texas Medical Branch Department of Otolaryngology Grand Rounds. 
  13. Taylor, John R. (1997-02-04). Interview with John Taylor. Retrieved on 2007-08-26.
  14. Bigelow. The Joy of Uncircumcising!, 13. 
  15. Bigelow. The Joy of Uncircumcising!, 1998 edition, 188–192. 
  16. 16.0 16.1 Goodwin, Willard E. (1990). "Uncircumcision: A Technique For Plastic Reconstruction of a Prepuce After Circumcision". Journal of Urology 144: 1203–5. 
  17. Hammond, T. (1999). "A Preliminary Poll of Men Circumcised in Infancy or Childhood" (PDF). BJU International 83 (Suppl. 1): 85–92. doi:10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.0830s1085.x. 
  18. Penn, Jack (1963). "Penile Reform". British Journal of Plastic Surgery 16: 287–8. doi:10.1016/S0007-1226(63)80123-X. 
  19. Boyle, GJ; Goldman R.; Svoboda, J.S.; Fernandez, E. (2002). "Male Circumcision: Pain, Trauma and Psychosexual Sequelae". Journal of Health Psychology 7 (3): 329–43. doi:10.1177/1359105302007003225. 
  20. Mohl, PC; Adams R, Greer DM, Sheley KA (1982). "Prepuce restoration seekers: psychiatric aspects". Archives of Sexual Behavior 10: 383–93. doi:10.1007/BF01565542. 
  21. Kirby, RS (1994). "Views and reviews: The Joy of Uncircumcising! Restore Your Birthright and Maximize Sexual Pleasure". BMJ 309: 679. 


  • Griffin, Gary M. (1992). Decircumcision: Foreskin Restoration, Methods and Circumcision Practices. Los Angeles: Added Dimensions Publishing. ISBN 1-879967-05-7. 
  • Bigelow, Jim (1992). The Joy of Uncircumcising!: Exploring Circumcision: History, Myths, Psychology, Restoration, Sexual Pleasure, and Human Rights. Aptos, CA: Hourglass Book Publishing. ISBN 0-9630482-1-X.  (foreword by James L. Snyder)

External links

fr:Restauration du prépuce